Against all odds, Korea has begun a rapid economic recovery, registering economic growth of 4.6 percent in the first quarter of this year. Meanwhile, the government-initiated corporate restructuring drive has entered an irreversible phase after almost 18 months of steady progress. The Korean government began its intervention in the affairs of the chaebol, or conglomerates, in February last year, subjecting them to a full-scale reform program. The move came amid mounting criticism of the family-owned chaebol system. Critics claimed the system was to blame in large part for the economic crisis, which invited the financial trusteeship of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), because of its lack of managerial efficiency and transparency. Economists at home and abroad at that time asserted that any recovery in the Korean economy largely depended on the success of chaebol reform. The program was launched after President Kim, Dae-jung succeeded in striking an agreement with the owners of the top five conglomerates on a five-point plan designed to expedite the corporate restructuring of the business sector, in the belief that chaebol reform was essential for the nation to overcome the financial crisis. The five points concern the improvement of business transparency, eradication of mutual debt payment guarantees, drastic improvements in the financial status of the chaebol, focusing on core business sectors and heightening the accountability of major shareholders. In order to promote managerial transparency, the five chaebol agreed to introduce consolidated financial statements in line with international standards from 1999. The cross-debt payment guarantee system among subsidiaries of the same conglomerate, which IMF Asia Pacific director Hubert Neiss has frequently described as a system leading to "Mutual suicide" will be dismantled completely by March 2000. Under the cross-guarantee system, bankruptcy at one subsidiary has led to the collapse of all of a business group's affiliates. Such an eventuality will disappear with the eradication of the system. Following government guidelines, the chaebol have pursued measures to lower their equity-debt ratio below 200 percent by the end of this year. In order to realize this goal, the chaebol must liquidate marginal subsidiaries or sell assets and stakes in other operations. In addition, if they wish to maintain a certain amount of shares they have to introduce foreign capital. Such measures have resulted in the termination of the so-called "fleet management" system through which the chaebol were able to maintain extensive control of a series of affiliates. The chaebol have also been urged to concentrate on only three to five core businesses to avoid overlapping investment and develop competitiveness in specific areas. Due to the revision of related laws and the advancement of the rights of minority shareholders, chaebol owners or their major shareholders have been forced to become more accountable for their managerial actions. Under the agreement, the chaebols are obliged to employ a certain proportion of outside auditors from this year, who will be given authority to monitor the activities of incumbent executives through special committees. Chaebol owners will be regarded as members of the board of directors and held responsible for inappropriate management. The government judges the efforts regarding three of the five points - improving managerial transparency, eradicating mutual debt payment guarantees and heightening the accountability of major shareholders - as having borne considerable fruit, supported as they are by legal and institutional initiatives plus endeavors by the chaebols themselves. It embarked on a major effort to address the two remaining points - reducing equity-debt ratios and focusing on key business divisions - in the latter half of last year. For example, the government announced a list of 55 companies that would be subjected to market exit by June 18th 1998, followed by an action program for the work-out of marginal businesses in June 30th 1998. These measures were designed to enable the chaebol achieve equity-debt ratios of 200 percent or less and to concentrate on key business divisions. Expediting Reform At a luncheon meeting held July 4th last year attended by major policy makers and business leaders, issues pertinent to the so-called "Big Deal," or swap of major business divisions among the chaebol, were discussed in detail. Discussions among the same parties regarding the Big Deal as well as the action program took place at a further meeting July 26th.
Under the Big Deal, the petrochemical divisions of Hyundai and Samsung were scheduled to merge into one judiciary corporation and boost the equity of the resultant body by 50 percent through an introduction of foreign capital. In the aerospace sector, the relevant divisions of Samsung, Hyundai and Daewoo were to be separated from their parent groups to emerge as an unitary company, with ownership shared equally by all three chaebol. In the rolling stock sector, the relevant business divisions of Hyundai Precision, Daewoo Heavy Industries and Hanjin Heavy Industries were to be separated from the groups to form a single corporate entity. Samsung Heavy Industries was to hand its ship engine division over to Korea Construction and Heavy Industries (Hanjung). Furthermore, Samsung Heavy Industries and Hyundai Heavy Industries were scheduled to hand their power generation facilities over to Hanjung while Hyundai was to take over Hanhwa's oil refining division. Hyundai was to take over LG's semiconductor division while Daewoo Motor was to assume control of Samsung's automotive division in return for handing over its electronics affiliate to Samsung. Currently, the major swaps in the areas of semiconductors, oil refining, power generation facilities, ship engines, aerospace and rolling stock have made steady progress toward completion. Daewoo and Samsung have yet to agree on details of the swap of the automotive division because of the matter of asset valuation and the assumption of Samsung Motor's 4 trillion won debt. Samsung has recently taken a negative view of the takeover of Daewoo's electronics division, prompting the Daewoo company to seek survival through attracting investment from United States and Japan. Samsung and Daewoo have been in protracted negotiations regarding the swap of the electronics division, pending progress in the automotive sector. The much-delayed swap negotiations in the petrochemical sector over a dispute over final equity holdings was wrapped up with an agreement between Hyundai and Samsung May 10th this year for the setup of a unified joint entity in September. In the process of putting pressure on the chaebol to restructure corporately, the government has met fierce resistance. The Big Deal drive faced a serious setback with the chaebol adopting a stance of passive resistance. Despite earlier pledges to decrease their debt ratios by, for instance, selling off real estate holdings, most conglomerates in fact lowered their debt ratios mostly in bookkeeping terms through a re-evaluation of assets. Many of them also postponed their corporate restructuring plans scheduled to take place throughout the whole year to just the latter half. In response, Lee Hun-jai, Chairman of the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), opened fire on the chaebol's attempt to "buy time." He made it clear that the commission will not acknowledge equity increases through asset re-evaluation and stock investment by subsidiaries as "self-saving" efforts. Lee's pronouncement caused the greatest disruptions in cash-poor Hyundai and Daewoo, which attempted to re-evaluate their assets by 6 trillion and 6.5 trillion won, respectively, until the FSC chairman's directive made them think otherwise. Applying Pressure Daewoo has been particularly insistant on being allowed to re-value its assets as it has been unable to generate sufficient funds through stock increases after the value of most of the stocks of its subsidiaries fell below their face value. The government, however, rebuffed Daewoo's request. In the meantime, Samsung, showing a determination to follow the government's lead, substantially wrapped up its negotiations with Daewoo on the swap of its automobile division March 22nd. SK and LG have pursued their own restructuring programs smoothly. Under the circumstances, Hyundai and Daewoo have become the main targets of the government's reform drive. Exasperated by the protracted negotiations over the swap by LG of its semiconductor division with Hyundai, Mr. Lee successfully pressured Hyundai to submit an appropriate price for purchase of LG Semicon after Hyundai was cornered by the exposure of its key executives for stock price manipulation. President Kim has also been pressuring Hyundai and Daewoo to expedite the process of reform within their own structures. In a Blue House press conference April 14th he said, "The reform drive by five major chaebol has fallen short of expectations. However, the five can now be subjected to work-out programs." Creditor banks inflicted the decisive blow, rejecting Daewoo and Hyundai's efforts to improve their financial status as insufficient "Self-relief efforts" April 16th. Under the agreement reached between the five chaebol and creditor banks, the latter are to pressure the former to improve their financial status if they are found to have made little progress in this regard. However, the creditor banks offered a grace period to Hyundai and Daewoo after they failed to meet the terms of the previous agreement. Meanwhile, Mr. Lee met with LG Group chairman Koo Bon-moo and Hyundai Group chairman Chung Mong-koo to mediate on the price negotiation regarding the semiconductor swap. The government previously pledged not to intervene at least in the negotiations on price but reversed its position, as there was no progress with the two sides remaining poles apart on this very sensitive issue. After marathon negotiations, the two groups completed the negotiations on the price Hyundai would pay LG for its semicon division April 21st. The Daewoo Group also made a huge contribution to the reform drive by taking the unprecedented step of putting its lucrative shipbuilding division up for sale April 19th. Hyundai responded by announcing additional corporate restructuring measures. With the top chaebol having announced their own corporate reform measures, it remains to be seen how and to what extent they will follow through. In order to prevent any backsliding by the large enterprises, the FSC will undertake comprehensive supervision on the chaebol's debt-reduction efforts, and take remedial action against them including the termination of credit lines and the repayment of outstanding bank loans. The framework and direction of the national corporate restructuring drive have been established. However, this by no means spells the end of the reform process, which in most of the corporate sector is far from complete. Recently, critics of corporare reform have expressed skepticism over the possible stalling of the conglomerates in this regard, amid concerns that the rapid economic recovery may retard their restructuring. In a clear demonstration of the incumbent government's unswerving commitment to restructuring the chaebol, reform-minded figures were appointed to major portfolios in the May 24th cabinet reshuffle. However, what is more important in this respect is the fact that the enterprises themselves now agree on the dire need for reform to ensure their survival. Given these circumstances, all indications are the chaebol will continue to restructure themselves without cessation and comply with their reform plans.
by Kwan Seok Lee
|
|